Lusha Review 2026: What Lusha Is, Where Its Data Holds Up and Who Should Pick Something Else

Lusha is a fair buy for small, email-first teams that look up named contacts in the browser and want monthly terms. In Spona's same-sample test it found a work email for 164 of 200 decision makers. Of those, 153 passed an independent verifier.

Skip it if you need many phones on a fixed budget, sell to stores and local owners, or want a dialer. Skip the seat plan when you buy data per campaign.

Get thousands of leads in 4 minutes.

Stop stitching tools together.
Start with verified sales data, delivered in minutes.

SCALE SALES NOW

No contracts · No setup · No onboarding

Lusha review: the short verdict

Lusha is a credit-based contact database with a Chrome extension at its centre. You open a LinkedIn profile, click the extension, and it reveals an email for 1 credit or a phone number for 5. The data is decent, the setup takes minutes, and the list price per contact is fair. The weak spots are phone cost, records that lag job changes, and the reset of unused credits on yearly plans.

Four public scores tell four different stories, and who writes each one matters:

Our verdict by situation rests on two criteria: the cost per usable phone number and the fit of the coverage. Pick Lusha if your reps prospect one profile at a time and send email first. Pick something else if phones are the main channel, or if your list is store owners and local businesses rather than office-based companies.

What is Lusha and who uses it?

Lusha is a B2B contact data platform. Its database holds 515M+ contacts and 29M+ companies, Lusha says. It puts 132M of those contacts in the United States. Those are Lusha's own figures, not audited counts.

Workspace is the web app for searching and building lists. The Chrome extension reveals emails and direct dials on LinkedIn, Gmail and company websites, and it syncs to Salesforce, HubSpot and monday CRM. Enrichment fills gaps in your CRM, and Intelligence adds intent signals, AI recommendations and website visitors. There is also an API and an MCP server that puts Lusha's data in Claude, ChatGPT and any MCP client.

Lusha says 280,000+ GTM teams use it. On G2, most reviewers work at small or mid-market companies. The Chrome Web Store counts 400,000 users. The typical workflow is a rep in Sales Navigator who needs the email and the number behind a profile, now.

Lusha's privacy policy names four data sources: "community members" who share their business network, affiliates, "trusted data brokers" and partners for company data. The extension also reads "the minimum Data presented on the LinkedIn profile pages that the End User is browsing". Under the CCPA, Lusha states that it has "sold the categories of personal data about Contacts".

Is Lusha reliable? A 200-contact test

Lusha states 98% email accuracy and 85% US phone accuracy across its database. Those are vendor claims. Spona measured instead.

Spona submitted the same 200 named decision makers to Lusha and four other tools. They were VP Sales, Head of Sales and CRO contacts at companies with 50 to 500 staff. Half sat in the US and the rest split between the UK and Germany. Every returned email went through MillionVerifier, an independent verifier, and nobody sent a test email, so there is no bounce rate.

Lusha returned a work email for 164 contacts, an 82% find rate. Of those, 153 passed the verifier, which is 93.3% validity among returned emails. Seven sat on catch-all domains and four were invalid. Lusha also returned a direct dial or mobile for 123 of the 200 contacts.

Read the 98% claim against that. On the emails Lusha did return, validity was high. The gap is the 36 contacts with no email at all. For named-contact lookups, that is the number to budget for.

Reviewer signals point the same way. A Capterra reviewer in staffing estimated a 60% success rate for accurate contacts. The outreach vendor Sparkle emailed 250 Lusha leads and reported a 3% bounce rate, with no verifier named.

What Lusha does well

Speed in the browser. The extension sits on the LinkedIn profile, and the data appears in one click. A RevOps analyst wrote on G2: "The Chrome extension fits naturally into my workflow, especially when I'm prospecting on LinkedIn."

Setup. A VP of GTM at an IT company with 201 to 500 employees told Capterra: "It is easy to set up and administer to the team with little to no training."

Phone depth where it hits. In Spona's test, Lusha returned a number for 123 of 200 contacts. A telecom reviewer noted: "The data extraction is solid too, often returning multiple phone numbers per contact."

Free plan and monthly terms. The free plan gives 40 credits a month, every month. Monthly plans roll unused credits over, up to twice the credit limit.

Compliance paperwork. Lusha lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27701, and says it is "GDPR certified by ePrivacyseal GmbH" and "CCPA validated by TrustArc". Those are Lusha's statements, but they are the documents a security review asks for.

MCP. Lusha's MCP server is live, so the data is one prompt away in Claude or ChatGPT.

Where Lusha falls short

Phones cost five credits. An email costs 1 credit and a phone number costs 5. A rep who works the phone drains a plan five times faster than a rep who emails.

Credits charged on wrong data. A staffing partner wrote on Capterra: "You are charged a credit even though you report the incorrect state of the contact details presented."

Outdated records. "Data is outdated, extracting the list is tedious at best," wrote an IT project manager at a company with 51 to 200 employees. On G2 the five most-mentioned cons all describe inaccurate or outdated data. A mid-market reviewer put the wish plainly: "I'd like to see Lusha invest more in real-time data updates."

Support. "After reaching out via email regarding an account issue, I received no response," a telecom reviewer told Capterra.

Annual reset and auto-renewal. Plans renew automatically, so put the renewal date in your calendar before you sign. On yearly plans, "Any unused credits will be reset at the end of the annual cycle."

No dialer. "It doesn't offer an inbuilt dialer where you can view and dial the number in real time," a founder wrote on G2. You copy numbers into your phone system.

Lusha reviews: what users report

Lusha on G2 and Capterra

G2 holds 1,671 reviews of Lusha. Of those, 1,043 give five stars and only 39 give one. The pros count Contact Information first, with 87 mentions, and Ease of Use second, with 66. That pattern is typical of a lookup tool: reps love the click and hate the credit spent on a stale number.

Capterra's 398 reviews average 4.0. Ease of use scores 4.6 and customer service 3.9. The written reviews repeat G2: fast to set up, light to run, patchy on data and on support.

Lusha on Trustpilot

Trustpilot shows a TrustScore of 1.2, "Bad", from 783 reviews. 57% are one-star and 18% five-star. Trustpilot notes that Lusha has not replied to negative reviews and has not recently invited any.

Read the one-star reviews and the author changes. Most are not buyers but people whose names and numbers sit in Lusha's database. One UK reviewer wrote: "Spam caller advised they got my phone number from this website."

Another complained that "they have listed my name and number as an electrical equipment supplier". That is why G2 and Trustpilot disagree: one audience rates the tool, the other rates being in it.

Is Lusha worth the money?

Lusha's list prices start with Starter at $49.90 a month for 400 credits. Pro is $69.90 a month for 600 credits and two seats. Premium is $399.90 a month for five seats, and yearly billing cuts each price by a quarter. The full plan breakdown covers rollover, extra seats and the Scale plan.

In Spona's arithmetic, a credit costs $0.087 on Pro billed yearly and $0.125 on Starter billed monthly. So an email costs $0.09 to $0.12. A phone number costs $0.44 to $0.62. The free plan covers 40 emails or 8 phone numbers a month.

For email-first lookups, Pro is fair value. For phone-heavy work the math turns. Pro's 600 credits buy 120 phone numbers. That is about $0.58 a number on monthly billing.

Contracts tracked by Vendr run far higher than the list. Its median Lusha contract is $15,999 a year, from 147 purchases. Its range runs from $6,000 to $70,403. Buyers saved 10.93% on average by negotiating.

Lusha came up on 13 of Spona's sales calls in recent months, and three of those calls gave a price. All three were Premium offers on annual terms for 3 to 5 seats. The prices ran from $1,648 to $1,847 a year, and two of the three renew automatically. Treat these as quotes heard on calls, not list prices.

Who should skip Lusha?

Spona's win/loss log names Lusha as the competitor in 17 of its 137 closed opportunities. Spona won six of them and lost five, and the other six ended with no decision. The quotes below record buyers' reasons in Spona deals, not verdicts on Lusha's data.

The wins show why buyers chose Spona over Lusha. The reason recorded in four of the six wins, from heads of sales and founders in Germany, France and the UK, reads: "We found the right people in the territory we actually sell to."

The other two wins, both agency owners in France, gave a purchase reason: "We could fund a focused pilot without buying more data than we needed." Both point to a list for one campaign, not a seat.

A separate Spona log names Lusha as the competitor or incumbent in two deals. A US agency owner with 11 to 50 staff switched: "The next campaign includes stores and local owners, not just office-based companies."

In the other, a German RevOps manager reached no decision: "We need the data-handling review finished before the pilot can start."

Among the 17 deals, a UK RevOps lead was "already committed to the incumbent for this budget period". If Lusha is paid for and your reps live in the extension, a second data tool is a hard sell. Three lost deals carry the same recorded reason: "We cannot add another paid workflow this quarter."

So skip Lusha when you buy data campaign by campaign, or when your list is stores and local owners. The tools people pick instead are in the alternatives post. Two comparison posts, Apollo vs Lusha and ZoomInfo vs Lusha, go head to head on credits, coverage and contracts.

Lusha vs Spona: per seat or per lead

Spona sells leads, not seats. You describe your ideal customer in a chat, the AI mines 40+ sources, verifies every lead and delivers a scored list in about 4 minutes. You pay per lead in credits, and every search starts with a free sample.

In the same 200-contact test, the two tools returned this:

Both tools ran on their Premium plans. No emails went out, so neither row has a bounce rate.

An email plus a phone costs six credits on Lusha. By our calculation, that is $0.52 to $0.75 a contact at list credit prices. On Spona's Standard Search the same lead with a mobile costs 35 to 55 credits. That is $0.28 to $0.55 a lead.

Spona's email-only Standard Search leads cost $0.024 to $0.07. Each new search session adds a one-time fee of 1,000 credits for the market mapping, $10 or less on every plan. By our calculation, five hundred leads with email and mobile cost about $260 to $375 in Lusha credits. At a cent a credit, the same list on Spona costs $185 to $285, session fee included.

One named contact at a time, Lusha is the better buy. Its extension reveals a phone number for $0.44 to $0.62. Spona's Targeted Search extension charges $0.70 to $0.88 for a mobile, and its email lookup costs about the same as Lusha's.

Lusha also gives 40 free credits every month, where Spona's free plan is 3,000 credits once. Lusha syncs to Salesforce, while Spona's only native CRM connector is HubSpot, on Premium and Expert, with CSV import for the rest. According to lusha.com, its Intelligence module adds intent signals and website visitors. Spona does not identify website visitors, and its MCP is announced, while Lusha's is live.

Spona is the better buy when you build a list by profile rather than by name. You see a free sample and the price per lead before you buy, and brick-and-mortar records cover stores and local owners. Spona's limits are real too. Every new segment costs the 1,000-credit session fee, the API sits on Expert only, and the dialer is announced, not live.

Get thousands of leads in 4 minutes.

Stop stitching tools together.
Start with verified sales data, delivered in minutes.

SCALE SALES NOW

No contracts · No setup · No onboarding

Lusha review FAQ

Is Lusha legit?

Yes. Lusha publishes its prices, and most of its 1,671 G2 reviews give five stars. It lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27701 on its site. The 1.2 Trustpilot score comes mostly from people who found their own number in the database, not from buyers.

Is Lusha free?

The free plan gives 40 credits a month. That covers 40 emails or 8 phone numbers. Paid plans start at $49.90 a month, and you can cancel at any time, effective at the end of the cycle.

Is Lusha GDPR compliant?

Lusha says it is "GDPR certified by ePrivacyseal GmbH" and relies on legitimate interest to process contact data. Italy's privacy regulator, the Garante, opened an inquiry into Lusha after reports of unwanted promotional calls.

The ICO says data on an identifiable person stays personal data in a business role. Before live B2B calls, you need to screen against both the CTPS and TPS registers. In the US, the FTC exempts most business-to-business sales calls from the Do Not Call rules.

Why does Lusha have my data?

Because a user shared it, or an affiliate or data broker supplied it. Lusha's privacy policy names community members who share their business network, affiliates and "trusted data brokers". You can request removal, which Lusha says is free and automatic, and the record then goes on a suppression list. One recipient documented a text reading "Your business contact information is processed by Lusha Systems Inc."

How does Lusha find phone numbers?

From the same sources: contacts shared by its user community, affiliates and data brokers, matched to the profile you are viewing. Lusha claims 85% US phone accuracy. In Spona's 200-contact test, Lusha returned a direct dial or mobile for 123 contacts, and nobody dialed them.